[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Themes
From: |
Michael Dean |
Subject: |
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Themes |
Date: |
19 May 2003 19:02:26 -0500 |
I realize that, and that's not my point. My point is that the fallback
should be a *different* template set. I know I wouldn't want to create
a set that used a lot of CSS, DHTML, and JavaScript that still degraded
gracefully on non-compliant browsers. It's more work to have one set
handle both (ala the old days of cross-browser JavaScript).
On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 09:31, Chris Weiss wrote:
> the fallback mode is so that if in an emergency you must use a text based
> browser
> you still can.
>
> Michael Dean (address@hidden) wrote:
> >
> >You could look at http://phplayersmenu.sourceforge.net/ for a LGPL
> >system.
> >
> >But really, I don't know why everyone thinks every template set should
> >have a fallback mode. It doesn't do any justice to the possibilities of
> >more advanced web clients. Creating a separate template set for
> >Links/Lynx/insert-text-browser-here makes a lot more sense.
> >