How many of its features do you personally know and use?
And that's all been done already and it's working. What does it mean, you ask? It is nice when something like this comes naturally to you!
But do you actually use this feature? Hopefully nothing broke in the process, but please drop me a line if you see anything suspicious. Do you know what it does? Labeling articles based simply on their content is not going to work. gnu-tar-archive", "public.
It is pathetic when a grown man, stranded in the bushes, cannot open a can without a can-opener.
Refactoring says you can't break interfaces. But do you actually use this feature?
Especially, if you extend it to prepare a full-blown breakfast including eggs, toasts and coffee! Played with it for about ten minutes. zip-archive", "com.
In my case, for example, I have close to half a thousand feeds that I subscribe to. These things don't have to be complicated to be useful.
I find TeX to be easier than Word, how about that! How many of its features do you personally know and use?
This would never happen to me on Windows.
I promise it's the last one. Pretty freaking great!
They rid us of that invaluable ordeal of the raw unprocessed life. Is it because something is cooking?
Combine the power of unix shell with wide adoption of AppleScript and you can achieve pretty much anything. How many of you even used your own custom styles?
That's how you learn that people still use those "obsolete" URL's in their feed-readers.
They rid us of that invaluable ordeal of the raw unprocessed life.
So far I have zero complaints and if you're wondering whether it is ready to be used in a real project or not, my opinion is that it is indeed ready.
We want to make sure that our newly developed ways of dealing with those challenges are simple enough to be easily reproduced.