[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows
From: |
jemarch |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:00:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.60 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> One limitation is that due to the fact that no fork is done when
> running the tests, there is no way to recover from a segfault in
> the test (Check handles this situation correctly and sets the test
> as 'Error').
>
> Well, that limitation is quite reasonable. We _dont_ want to write a
> check replacement for windows :)
AFAIK, Check developers are in fact really interested in a full-featured
windows port. They might have one someday.
Then I guess we will have to keep an eye in the check development :)
> As I noted before I would prefer to simply include <check.h> and do
> the trick with the preprocessor options. I dont like unit tests to
> have a dependency in a specific driver (such as runtests.[ch]).
Ok.
I will make all these changes and send you the diff again for
review.
Many thanks.
--
Jose E. Marchesi <address@hidden>
<address@hidden>
GNU Spain http://es.gnu.org
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, (continued)
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, gerel, 2008/04/17
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, Aleksander Morgado, 2008/04/18
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, jemarch, 2008/04/18
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, Aleksander Morgado, 2008/04/20
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, jemarch, 2008/04/21
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, Aleksander Morgado, 2008/04/21
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, jemarch, 2008/04/21
- Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows,
jemarch <=
Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows, jemarch, 2008/04/18