Re: [pdf-devel] unit tests

[jemarch]

   That sounds like a reasonable plan.

   >
   > See for example http://gnupdf.org/Lib:Torture_Chamber/Stream_Module
   >

   That looks good.  Is there a danger of documentation overload?  I
   wonder if it wouldn't be better to be slightly more terse w/ regards
   to individual unit test documentation on the wiki, in exchange for
   more verbosity in the test code source files...

The documentation in Lib:Torture_Chamber/Stream_Module is the same
that you can find in `test_stm_module.c' (comments before the
functions). The good side of having the unit tests documented in the
wiki is that we can design the testsuites before to code the unit
tests.