|
From: | Eduardo lavratti |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning |
Date: | Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:08:32 -0300 |
Hi Heinrich, i searching for a good paper about backstapping a long time ago.
Can yoy send me this paper ? regards. > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:33:55 +0200 > From: address@hidden > To: address@hidden > Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Any suggestion of improvement for PID tuning > > Hi, > a more efficient system is backstapping, a model based system. > If you want to integrate in paparazzi i can send you a paper of it. > The basic idea is to use not a feedback control system for the > stabilization. > Instead the the rate signals are multiplied with a negative factor > and the result is used for the generation of the basic signals trust, > roll pitch and yaw. > The stick signals are direct used the additionally. > I can send you same papers of it. > I wrote togehter with pione a paper. I use backstepping since six > years for my one muticopter software. It works perfect and generate less > vibrations. > I think you need less than 30 lines of code to implement it in paparazzi. > But it is difficult to find out where to change the code. > Regads > > Heinrich > > > Eltonwu schrieb: > > > Currently I try to tune the PID params of attitude more efficient.The > >performance of the PID is not still satisfied.If I operate the stick gently. > >the copter perform steady and no oscillation,but if I operate the stick > >roughly,such as perform a brake suddenly when the copter speed is very high > >speed. the copter oscillate very much about 500 ms and become steady. > > > > the following is the curves when flying . Can anyone give me some > >suggestion to improve the PID? > > > >Thanks in advance > > > ><define name="PHI_PGAIN" value="135"/> > ><define name="PHI_DGAIN" value="88"/> > ><define name="PHI_IGAIN" value="80"/> > ><define name="PHI_DDGAIN" value="120"/> > ><http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/1358880.png> > ><http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/ff_1358880.png> > > > ><define name="PHI_PGAIN" value="145"/> > ><define name="PHI_DGAIN" value="88"/> > ><define name="PHI_IGAIN" value="5"/> > ><define name="PHI_DDGAIN" value="120"/> > ><http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/1458805.png> > ><http://lists.paparazziuav.org/file/n16076/ff1458805.png> > > > > > > > > > >-- > >View this message in context: http://lists.paparazziuav.org/Any-suggestion-of-improvement-for-PID-tuning-tp16076.html > >Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Paparazzi-devel mailing list > >address@hidden > >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Paparazzi-devel mailing list > address@hidden > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |