|
From: | Tilman Baumann |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] circular polarized antenna hype |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:03:13 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 23/07/12 14:47, Marc Schwarzbach wrote:
Hi Tilman, the basic principle of loss of signal strength when two linear antennas are out of phase applys to XBee, too, of course. So you could avoid that by spending a constant loss of 3dB when using a circular polarized antenna on one side. In my oppinion it makes sense when using a higher gain circular on the ground (patch or helix) and a standard omni on the plane. I´m a little sceptical with all the hype around cloverleaves and so on... Also look fragile when used on the plane :-)
True. Eventually I would like to invest in a antenna tracker at the ground station.
I have no problems with 2.4GHz Xbees with standard wire antennas up to 1km. Do you have problems with your connection?
Not really. But since I fly 2.4Ghz the range is not terribly long and I wonder if I might get better reception at the fringes of the range.
Anyway. I just wonder if the wondrous advantages the FPV guys keep harping around would apply to us. :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |