paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] LONG RANGE data radios - what the best


From: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] LONG RANGE data radios - what the best
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:25:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030619 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Hi,
can you use the xbeepro 868 Mhz?
http://www.reichelt.de/Bausaetze-Module/ZIGBEE-XP-868H/3/index.html?;ACTION="">
If you use atennas with gain and a mast on the ground station you will have more distance than 40 km.
If you have money you can use  a satellite phone.

Heinrich


j schrieb:
On 05/31/2012 07:47 AM, Eduardo lavratti wrote:
The problem is that:
where i fly not have mobile phone access.



> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:06:59 +0200
> From:
address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] LONG RANGE data radios - what the best
>
> 9XTEND should go well over 50km:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/paparazzi-devel/2012-04/msg00224.html
>
> But GSM is a perfect idea as well. It has the major advantages of
> requiring neither line-of-sight nor directional antennas. Let us know
> as soon as you have a GSM setup working.
>
> Cheers, Reto
>
> 2012/5/31 Rokas Adiklis <address@hidden>:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> >
> > 9XTEND's are great radios, but I doubt they would work 50km+. Specs say max
> > range is 64km, but only in ideal conditions: direct line of sight, high gain
> > antennas, good weather, low data transmission speed and most probably you
> > would need antenna trackers on GCS and on the aircraft. I've used these
> > radios for up to 10 km without these prerequisites (standard antennas, no
> > tracking, no direct line-of-sight, some trees around). Going further than
> > 10km rendered connection inactive. Also, formally these should be illegal in
> > EU.
> >
> > In your case I would use GSM for communication. You need a "GSM to Serial
> > data" type of device for the aircraft, and internet access (preferrably with
> > fixed IP address) on your computer with "TCP to COM" type of software
> > installed. GSM modem receives serial data from PPZ, tunnels it over TCP
> > (GPRS/3G/4G) to your computer, where the recipient service passes this data
> > to virtual COM port. The virtual COM port is the one configured in GCS as a
> > "modem".
> >
> > I haven't tried it myself, but intend to some time this year.
> >
> > This is the kind of device that I'm talking about:
> > http://www.teltonika.lt/en/pages/view/?id=747 (just for reference, I think
> > you can find cheaper and more functional devices made elsewhere).
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Rokas
> >
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Eduardo lavratti <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> friends i will order a pair of long range radios  for telemetry.
> >> I am think in digi 9XTEND radios.
> >>
> >> This is the most powerfull data radio i know but i see that some people
> >> have problem using this radio.
> >> have more options for long range radios ?
> >>
> >> i will fly more than 50km away.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
    
If youre a HAM then you could go with APRS if you are not transmitting huge amounts in your data stream.

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]