paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Paparazzi-devel] RE: Paparazzi-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 25


From: mohammed filfil
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] RE: Paparazzi-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 25
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:42:30 +0100

please dont send me all those emails.
 
 
 
 

 
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:00:05 -0500
> From: address@hidden
> Subject: Paparazzi-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 25
> To: address@hidden
>
> Send Paparazzi-devel mailing list submissions to
> address@hidden
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> address@hidden
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> address@hidden
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Paparazzi-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. use git to import the paparazzi subversion repository
> (Felix Ruess)
> 2. Spektrum Satellite Receiver (Gareth Roberts)
> 3. Re: Spektrum Satellite Receiver (Todd Sandercock)
> 4. Re: Spektrum Satellite Receiver (Gareth Roberts)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:47:04 +0100
> From: Felix Ruess <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] use git to import the paparazzi subversion
> repository
> To: Paparazzi devel list <address@hidden>
> Message-ID:
> <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi,
>
> for those of you keen to use the git version control system for
> paparazzi I wrote a short guide how to import the paparazzi repo:
> http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Git
>
> Since git is a distributed vcs you have the whole repository
> (including) history on your machine. You can do all operations without
> connection to the central subversion server which can come in very
> handy on the airfield. But this is just one of the many benefits ;-)
>
> Cheers, Felix
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:05:45 +0000
> From: Gareth Roberts <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] Spektrum Satellite Receiver
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've got a Spekrum DX-7, with an AR-7000 receiver. It's satellite
> (diversity) receiver communicates with the main bit using a simple
> serial protocol. Code to translate this has been written for the Booz,
> but not for paparazzi core. Is there any way to reuse this code for the
> traditional system? Or will I have to adapt it?
>
> Many Thanks
> --G
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:43:24 -0800 (PST)
> From: Todd Sandercock <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Spektrum Satellite Receiver
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> If you want some reliable range having more than one satelite would be a good move. Multiple usarts would be required for that which leads to the use of an external micro. I did some research into this and concluded an XMEGA chip would be perfect for this until I realised that the chip can't be programed with ISP (I don't have the right programmer for it). The smallest chip has 5 usarts from memory which means good expanability if someone wanted to go crazy with the satelites
>
> Sparkfun have back in stock a break out board that would be suitable for the XMEGA but would require soldering the chip on. (not that hard)
>
> Just ideas.....
>
> Todd
>
> On 24/01/2010, at 7:35 AM, Gareth Roberts <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've got a Spekrum DX-7, with an AR-7000 receiver. It's satellite
> (diversity) receiver communicates with the main bit using a simple
> serial protocol. Code to translate this has been written for the Booz,
> but not for paparazzi core. Is there any way to reuse this code for the
> traditional system? Or will I have to adapt it?
>
> Many Thanks
> --G
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________________
> See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:33:39 +0000
> From: Gareth Roberts <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Spektrum Satellite Receiver
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Good idea Todd, but one step at a time!
>
> We'd just be happy to have the one, it's functionally identical to the
> main receiver so in theory should have the same range as a slightly
> cheaper Spektrum set without the diversity receiver. We fly near power
> lines and are getting sick of 35MHz random control inputs.
> I'd be quite happy otherwise to try and make the alterations myself, but
> I'm unclear as to how much core code Booz and Paparazzi share. Just
> wondered if someone had done it already, or if I can just change a
> compile flag (assuming the data structures in the Booz code are
> compatible).
>
> Cheers!
> --G
>
> On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:43 -0800, Todd Sandercock wrote:
> > If you want some reliable range having more than one satelite would be a good move. Multiple usarts would be required for that which leads to the use of an external micro. I did some research into this and concluded an XMEGA chip would be perfect for this until I realised that the chip can't be programed with ISP (I don't have the right programmer for it). The smallest chip has 5 usarts from memory which means good expanability if someone wanted to go crazy with the satelites
> >
> > Sparkfun have back in stock a break out board that would be suitable for the XMEGA but would require soldering the chip on. (not that hard)
> >
> > Just ideas.....
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > On 24/01/2010, at 7:35 AM, Gareth Roberts <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > We've got a Spekrum DX-7, with an AR-7000 receiver. It's satellite
> > (diversity) receiver communicates with the main bit using a simple
> > serial protocol. Code to translate this has been written for the Booz,
> > but not for paparazzi core. Is there any way to reuse this code for the
> > traditional system? Or will I have to adapt it?
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > --G
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________________
> > See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> End of Paparazzi-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 25
> ***********************************************


Saml alle vennerne fra Hotmail, Facebook og Myspace på Messenger Læs mere her.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]