How does this relate to infrared.c?? Re: [Paparazzi-devel] paparazzi HW

[gwen hastings]

Subject stands .. as list etiquette please dont reply to other subjects 
by way of starting a totally new subject, instead start a new thread 
instead of replying to others.. this way it just gets too confusing, Thanx


      gwen
ps how much on your HW and how does this relate to tiny or classix?



address@hidden wrote:
> Hi, 
> i will produce the following items (on pick/place machines, 603 only)
>
> lpc213x/4x with XBEE module, connector for other radio modules and external GPS, 
> micro-SD card holder, 4Mbit Flash memory, PPM input (isolated), PS2 Controller 
> input, optional pressure sensor (uses 2xadc & dac), inputs for external ADC 
> (IR-Sensor as example), isolated connector for servo board, FSK output for APRS, 
> and of course, USB on the 4x versions. As example, i want use the LPC2142 for the 
> base station offering
> USB to GPS/MODEM/rc-receiver/gamepad connection and eventually encryption
> of the modem link (without SD card fitted). On the UAV, a higher lpc213x
> CPU (4x is possible) can do the job. The reason to divide servos, rc-receiver, 
> gps from the main cpu and RF-module is to minimize interferencing.
>
> Servo board.
>
> Further, one board having a 8051 processor with 8x 24bit ADC and
> 3D magnetometer + 2x pressure sensors.
>
> Finally the IMU board with gyros and accel sensors.
> I don´t have decided, if using the IDG300 and one ADXRS or three
> ADXRS because there are far superior on bias correction.
> The advantage of the IDG300, apart of beeing 15$ cheaper, is that
> only one board is needed compared to the not so easy mounting of the
> ADRX gyros.
>
> If someone would discuss offlist on this HW project, please contact me.
>
> PS:
> Building a tiny board with the same schematic is possible with the exception of 
> the dc/dc converter, using oem modules.
>  
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>   
> > Datum: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:15:42 +0200
> > Von: address@hidden
> > An: address@hidden
> > Betreff: [Paparazzi-devel] Code cleaning
> >     
>
>   
> > Good evening ladies and gentlemen
> >
> > Looking at the code and especialy the infrared.c file, it appears that
> > over the
> > years, we have accumulated some not so used features.
> > For example, we have 4 differents ways of dealing with infared
> > measurements
> >  -without vertical sensor using ground calibration
> >  -without vertical sensor using the famous LLS filter
> >  -with vertical sensor using a linear function
> >  -with vertical sensor using the IR360 method ( atan2 )
> >
> > This leads to 340 lines of not so easy to read code and dozains of not so
> > easy
> > to understand parameters. What about removing all that and leaving only
> > the
> > IR360 method which seems the most efficient ?
> >
> > If anybody has a strong oposition to this, please let us know
> >
> > Poine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >     
>
>   


--
  "Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
   after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."