[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?
From: |
Rob |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:24:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-17-generic; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) |
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 01:34 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Google hasn't just released the Go programming language as free, open
> source software out of charity,
If Google were primarily known for Go, you might have a point, but Google
has the specific policy of encouraging their employees to work on passion
projects 20% of the time (google for google 80/20), some of which end up as
free software. Google also develops other software for internal use, some
of which (like Go) it releases as free software, while most of its
"consumer-oriented" software and virtually all of its web services -- its
bread and butter -- are proprietary code.
The web services, and specifically the advertising from those services
which wouldn't be viable if the web services were free software (as in
Affero GPL) and easily recreated by other people with big servers, are what
generate the revenue that pay for the 80/20 program and research projects
like Go.
In other words, it's like a textbook example of what Joe was describing,
not a Red Hat situation where the company was started purely to provide
support and packaging for an otherwise free product.
Rob
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Leslie Newell, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Leslie Newell, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?,
Rob <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Rob, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/11
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/11
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/11
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Rob, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Leslie Newell, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, walt, 2010/03/08