[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101
From: |
Brad Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101 |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:31:51 +0000 |
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:47:19 +0000
Graham <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello Graham,
> > Because it /should/ be "toe the line".
> No, no.
[snip excellent explanation]
Just goes to show, doesn't it? Even into my forties, I've been
labouring under a misapprehension for some thirty odd years.
As our Trans-Atlantic cousins would say "Go figure". :-)
Since this has nowt to do with Pan now, I think I'll leave it there.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
I'm surfing on a wave of nostalgia for an age yet to come
Nostalgia - The Buzzcocks
- [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, (continued)
- [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, Duncan, 2007/01/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, Tim Kynerd, 2007/01/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, Robert Marshall, 2007/01/07
- [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, Duncan, 2007/01/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, Tim Kynerd, 2007/01/07
- [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, Graham, 2007/01/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, Brad Rogers, 2007/01/07
- [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, arndalebilo, 2007/01/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, fwxgqa302, 2007/01/08
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, Graham, 2007/01/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101,
Brad Rogers <=
- [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, Duncan, 2007/01/08
- Re: [unclassified] [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, Graham, 2007/01/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: [OT] Pan Docs 070101, Tim Kynerd, 2007/01/07
- [Pan-users] Re: Pan Docs 070101, Darren Albers, 2007/01/05
- Re: [Pan-users] Pan Docs 070101, Douglas Bollinger, 2007/01/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Pan Docs 070101, Darren Albers, 2007/01/06
Re: [Pan-users] Pan Docs 070101, Darren Albers, 2007/01/01