pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com


From: Francesco Lamonica
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:00:16 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 23 September 2002 17:50, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 17:54, John J. LeMay Jr. wrote:
> > ** Reply to message from Søren Boll Overgaard <address@hidden> on 23 Sep
> > 2002 17:36:06 +0200
> >
> > > AFAIK, putting an apostrophe is short for "pan is website", which is
> > > not what I meant.
> >
> > Only sometimes. In this case the apostrophe is used to show ownership.
> > The website "belongs" to pan, at least gramatically. Without the
> > apostrophe "pans" becomes a plural - as in more than one pan - not what
> > you wanted either!
>
> I stand corrected.
since we're completely offtopic..... :-))))) isnt the \"'s\" used just for 
someone who can 'possess' things? i.e. a man? i thought that for object the 
use of 'of' would have to be preferred

oh... power users repeated twice?
- -- 
Francesco Lamonica: f DOT lamonica AT tin DOT it

PGP Fingerprint: 5870 92BA 8DFF 1ACF DE2E  B94D 46EC 5505 7C64 4EF1
Favourite quote: There's no spoon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9jzqSRuxVBXxkTvERAknNAKDqa7aHyNODDaAJMJ28a4bzyjYfOQCghV2L
C3J4BWs7r/3WpzkRQY8SwIc=
=8XOD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]