openvortex-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Openvortex-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [ALSA - driver 0001138]: error


From: Alien
Subject: Re: [Openvortex-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [ALSA - driver 0001138]: errors when installing au8820 modules
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:17:40 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2

Op dinsdag 7 juni 2005 19:05, schreef Igor Kovalenko:
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:16:02 +0200,
> >
> > Alien wrote:
> >>[1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
> >>
> >>Op dinsdag 7 juni 2005 17:05, schreef Raymond:
> >>>The patch (diff11.diff) cause segmenation fault on my 32bit machine
> >>>during /etc/init.d/alsasound start
> >>>
> >>>http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3948
> >>>
> >>>Do anyone know why readl() and writel() behave different in i386
> >>>(32bits) and AMD64 (64bits) ?
> >>>
> >>>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10773530
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
> >>>
> >>>#define        hwread(x,y) readl((x)+((y)>>2))
> >>>#define        hwwrite(x,y,z) writel((z),(x)+((y)>>2))
> >>>
> >>>#else
> >>>
> >>>#define        hwread(x,y) readl((x)+(y))
> >>>#define        hwwrite(x,y,z) writel((z),(x)+(y))
> >>>
> >>>#endif
> >>
> >>that doesn't look good, unless the mmio is void* in 32bit and unsigned
> >> long* in x86_64...
> >>
> >>'unsigned long* mmio' should be preferred and together with '#define
> >>hwread(x,y) readl((x)+(y))' , this works for both platforms
> >
> > I guess using "unsigned long" for both architectures is broken, too.
> > Should be "u32" to be arch-independent.
>
> I strongly believe readl() and writel() on x86_64 does 32 bit reads/writes.
> (checked linux-2.6.12-rc5). Therefore reads/writes are of correct size with
> that patch - should be something different.

i know that does not work!

when i started doing this, i got segfaults because of the >>2 .

readl and writel do long operations as evidenced by the 'l'

i know this seems weird, but this is memory-mapped, and appearantly it's 
memory mapped to long, anyway; when i do 'unsigned long* mmio' and i use 
readl and writel without any bitshifts, it works...

you may believe what you want, but i _know_ that on x86_64, i _NEED_ unsigned 
long* mmio and no bitshifting to get this to work.

maybe the problem lies with writel and readl to begin with, maybe if you wrote 
an int, it would work...

AL13N

Attachment: pgpG1gUoyAx8b.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]