[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9974] [octave forge](mapping) gc2sc scxsc

From: anonymous
Subject: [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9974] [octave forge](mapping) gc2sc scxsc gcxsc
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:38:58 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0

Follow-up Comment #10, patch #9974 (project octave):

Thank you for looking into this.

I have read and understand how I could have used only vectors.
I hope to have some time to look and understand comment #8 and comment #9

It looks like you are seeing some good corner cases to test.
As you said s.o. was a good starting point.
If you get to it before me there would be no issues.


States specifically use haversine for small distances.
If your results are robust then the code can be cleaner.


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]