Re: Build a portable linux binary?

[roland65]

John W. Eaton wrote
> Last year I attempted to deliver a binary built with MXE that could be 
> used on just two systems, RHEL 6 and SuSE 11.  I performed the build on 
> the SuSE system because it had the older libc of the two.  My build 
> replaced as many system libraries as possible.  In the end, I think it 
> just required libc, ld.so, and a few other very low-level system 
> libraries.  I built and distributed everything else.  I was able to 
> install and run Octave on both systems.  But the customer reported 
> issues.  In the end, I just built and delivered binaries for both of the 
> systems I wanted to support.

OK, I see...

However, I've seen this project:
https://github.com/wheybags/glibc_version_header
That seems interesting but they say they don't support C++ yet, and there
are also some issues...






--
Sent from: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Maintainers-f1638794.html