[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No
|
From: |
Michael Godfrey |
|
Subject: |
Re: No |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:13:46 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
On 01/30/2015 08:59 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
If the Windows code goes into the default branch at the onset and is
in a constant flux it could mean a higher version release rate if you
want people with Windows access to test. But that means everything in
default branch needs to be robust when there could be other
development things going on.
Another benefit of no branches.
- Re: Keeping the gui-release branch open considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: Keeping the gui-release branch open considered harmful, Daniel J Sebald, 2015/01/30
- Re: Keeping the gui-release branch open considered harmful, John W. Eaton, 2015/01/30
- Re: Keeping the gui-release branch open considered harmful, Daniel J Sebald, 2015/01/30
- No, Michael Godfrey, 2015/01/30
- Re: No, Daniel J Sebald, 2015/01/30
- Re: No,
Michael Godfrey <=
- Re: No, Daniel J Sebald, 2015/01/30
- Re: No, Michael Godfrey, 2015/01/30
Re: Keeping the gui-release branch open considered harmful, Mike Miller, 2015/01/30