[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [FORGE] updating sockets
From: |
JohnD |
Subject: |
RE: [FORGE] updating sockets |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:13:11 -0500 |
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Juan Pablo Carbajal
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:13 PM
To: JohnD
Cc: octave-maintainers; Paul Dreik
Subject: Re: [FORGE] updating sockets
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:05 PM, JohnD <address@hidden> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:32:44 +0100
> From: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
> To: Octave Maintainers List <address@hidden>
> Cc: Paul Dreik <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [FORGE] updating sockets
> Message-ID:
>
> <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> [1]: http://zeromq.org/intro:start
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I guess is time to release a new sockets package, even if only to
>> remove the deprecation warning.
>>
>> Since a while I am trying to get something nice working to connect
>> Octave and Python. I found ?MQ [1] and I thought we should pimp up
>> the socket package to use ?MQ + some package creator (I am looking at
>> JSON and MSGPACK).
>>
>> What do you think of this?
>> Do you see any problems (like license issues, etc... it shouldn't ?MQ
>> is
> LGPL)
>> Do you have suggestions?
>
>
> -----------
>
> I use zeromq for a few projects and have been meaning to create a
> zeromq package for octave, just never gotten around to it.
>
>
Ok, that's cool.
I was planning to start with something rather constrained, as I have little
experience with the lib.
Where you planning to do the whole binding? Do you have a plan you can share?
-----
Makes sense for somethingconstrained to start with. I usually use PUB/SUB or
REQ/REP socket types so if ever got around to doing something, was going to
implement one or both of those sets of sockets with,
poll,send,recv,bind,connect