|
From: | Marco Atzeri |
Subject: | Re: [forge] physicalconstants ? |
Date: | Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:51:23 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
On 12/02/2014 15:31, c. wrote:
On 11 Feb 2014, at 22:45, Marco Atzeri <address@hidden> wrote:Am I wrong or http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/12548/ removed the version 2 that Carlo just updated, while in miscellaneous we have the old version ? Regards MarcoYes, Carnë did that because he doesn't want a new package. I would be glad to maintain physicalconstants but I don't care about maintaining miscellaneous (and general upon which miscellaneous depends) so I'm sorry, you have to stick to the unmaintained version of physicalconstants. c.
so to resume : - we had a physicalconstants standalone package for ages - it was moved to miscellaneous as the maintainer disappear and roughly every four year we need a serious update - we have a new volunteer and we stick to the old version in miscellaneous Really, I do not follow the logic. I was assuming the reverseI had already prepared the binary of 2.0 version for cygwin and I was ready to deploy the ~ 51 forge packages with the new octave
3.8.0 release. (I am only waiting your update of integration). So now I need to re-look at the physicalconstants scenario.... Regards Marco
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |