[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:56:26 +0100 |
On 19 Nov 2013, at 19:37, Michael D. Godfrey <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is it worth considering a 3.8 release without the GUI, and a 4.0 release with
> GUI when the GUI is definitely suitable for general use on all platforms?
> This may satisfy the differing views about 3.8 and 4.0 and avoid releasing
> a buggy GUI.
>
> Michael
or maybe also ship the GUI with 3.8 but
have octave be octave-cli for 3.8
and octave-gui for 4.0?
c.
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, (continued)
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, John Swensen, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, John Swensen, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/20
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Doug Stewart, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again,
c. <=
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/11/20
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, John W. Eaton, 2013/11/21
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/11/20
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/20
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/11/20
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Rik, 2013/11/19