[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
merge classdef to default?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
merge classdef to default? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:19:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 |
On 07/30/2013 09:57 AM, Michael Goffioul wrote:
There's preliminary support in the classdef branch. It started here:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7368654f302f?revcount=240
Should we merge the classdef branch to default?
If we do it now, does it cause any harm to have it in the upcoming
release? I suppose that since it is incomplete, people will try it and
have some trouble, then report bugs. But we can (try to) make it clear
that it is a preliminary work in progress.
If you think it will cause more harm than good, then we can delay the
merge until after we merge default to stable for the release.
jwe
- initial release of matlab compatible netcdf interface for octave, Alexander Barth, 2013/07/30
- Re: initial release of matlab compatible netcdf interface for octave, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: initial release of matlab compatible netcdf interface for octave, Alexander Barth, 2013/07/30
- merge classdef to default?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: merge classdef to default?, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: merge classdef to default?, John W. Eaton, 2013/07/30
- Aw: Re: merge classdef to default?, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/07/30