[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison
From: |
ionone |
Subject: |
Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 03:13:55 -0700 (PDT) |
thank you for your answer
i'll tend to believe you and i understand what you meant (and thank you for
that) that different inverse() functions may give different results and it's
logical, but what i don't understand is that Octave's inverse function makes
the DSP works and if Octave uses Lapack, using the same funtions on the same
numbers should give the same results, no ? Even if the numbers aren't equal
due to approximation and numbers very close, etc it should give the exact
same results with the same functions. Maybe i didn't tried yet the good
functions ?
Jeff
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-C-matrix-Inv-comparison-tp4655291p4655536.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, (continued)
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, CdeMills, 2013/07/09
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, ionone, 2013/07/10
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, Nir Krakauer, 2013/07/10
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, Pascal Dupuis, 2013/07/10
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, ionone, 2013/07/10
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, CdeMills, 2013/07/10
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, ionone, 2013/07/11
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, ionone, 2013/07/11
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, CdeMills, 2013/07/11
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison,
ionone <=
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, CdeMills, 2013/07/12
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, mtall, 2013/07/16
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, Jean-François LE BAS, 2013/07/19
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, Ed Meyer, 2013/07/17
- Re: Octave/C++ matrix Inv() comparison, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/07/17