|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: binocdf inaccuracy in Octave |
Date: | Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:33:45 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
On 07/08/2013 04:22 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
So, we should never really be doing any such kind of ret = 1 - numlibfunc (...) However, do a search [sebald@ scripts]$ grep " 1 -" * -r and the scripts, at least, are littered with all sorts of operations. Rik, you really discovered something here...looks like you have your work cut out for you! :-)
I suppose this is really a cosmetic thing. I mean, on the other end
k = 1
k = 1
betainc (1-1e-3, k+1, 50-k)
ans = 1 is losing it's accuracy as well, i.e., it should really be 1 - 1e-150. Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |