[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:51:31 -0400 |
On 24-Jun-2011, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
| (1) Facilitate easy setup of a build environment, if possible along the
| lines of the current MingW installers.
| Given MingW's dynamics, standardizing on some snapshot and updating
| annually or so might be handy
So now the Octave project is responsible for fixing the problems
associated with setting up MinGW?
| (2) Somehow share prebuilt dependencies (compiled libraries, patched include
| stuff, etc).
| Octave-forge?
And now we are also responsible for making some kind of package system
(or something) so that it is easier to build dependencies on Windows
systems?
| Perhaps someone can even zip & upload his/her complete MingW build
| environment + dependencies, including some instructions for path settings
| etc.
So who is supposed to do that? Are those of us who don't use and
don't even like Windows supposed to be the ones to do it?
| John W. Eaton <jwe <at> octave.org> Wed Jun 22 16:06:28 CDT 2011 writes:
|
| > Windows binary that should be sufficient to get competent programmers
| > started and it has been downloaded a fairly large number of times, yet
| > I'm still waiting to see the Windows programmers contributing.
|
| ?
| No offense taken, but e.g., most of what I contributed came from Octave
| under Windows (but is applicable to any OS). Windows is where I use Octave
| the most often.
| And I guess you overlooked octave-forge contributors? A number of them do
| their development work on Windows as well.
| But perhaps I've misunderstood what you wrote.
I was talking about people who are actually working on the core of
Octave itself, for Windows, not just writing .m files with Octave
running on Windows.
jwe
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, (continued)
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Richard Crozier, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Jacob Dawid, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Richard Crozier, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, John W. Eaton, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Søren Hauberg, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, John W. Eaton, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, fork, 2011/06/22
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/06/23
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, fork, 2011/06/27
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Philip Nienhuis, 2011/06/24
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, fork, 2011/06/24
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Philip Nienhuis, 2011/06/25
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Jacob Dawid, 2011/06/25
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Michael Goffioul, 2011/06/26
- Message not available
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Jacob Dawid, 2011/06/26
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Søren Hauberg, 2011/06/26
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/06/26
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, John W. Eaton, 2011/06/27
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, John W. Eaton, 2011/06/24
- Re: Performance issues on Windows, suggests a MSVC build, Philip Nienhuis, 2011/06/25