[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug tracker and transplants
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Bug tracker and transplants |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:22:40 -0500 |
2011/4/1 John W. Eaton <address@hidden>:
> On 1-Apr-2011, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>
> | On 1 April 2011 14:06, Rik <address@hidden> wrote:
> | > As far as I understand it, the version field is extra
> | > information, like the operating system, that helps to narrow
> | > down where a bug might lie. I don't think it's being used in
> | > the way you suggest (to track which bugs need to be
> | > transplanted).
> |
> | Would I be entirely too repetitive if I insist that it would be
> | better to avoid these problems by patching on stable and merging
> | the patches onto default?
>
> Well, you are pretty repetitive about this topic...
>
> But you are probably also right about what we should be doing.
>
> Before we can switch to doing what you suggest, I would like to
> understand what will happen in the following cases:
This is what the hg pros had to say about it:
http://mercurial.808500.n3.nabble.com/Suggested-workflow-for-Octave-td2768774.html
Greg Ward's response seems particularly detailed.
HTH,
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, Rik, 2011/04/01
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/04/01
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/01
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Rik, 2011/04/04
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Orion Poplawski, 2011/04/04
- Re: Release 3.4.1, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Rik, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/07
- Re: stable and default branches, Rik, 2011/04/07
- Re: stable and default branches, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/08