[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should more things be packages?
|
From: |
Richard Campbell |
|
Subject: |
Should more things be packages? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:26:07 -0500 |
Has it been brought up recently whether or not the functionality of some of the
things that are included in the Octave source tree, but "optional" at compile
time based on configure detecting some dependency or another, should instead be
packages? Things like FLTK, the numerous sparse matrix things?
Campbell
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Should more things be packages?,
Richard Campbell <=