|
From: | Michael D Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: texinfo |
Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:49:57 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/24/2011 12:18 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
Seems like a good idea to leave it as is. Since there is a pretty wideOn 24-Jan-2011, Michael D Godfrey wrote: | texi2dvi and texi2pdf are also used. OK, those are also just shell scripts, which we could distribute if needed. | Probably best to worry about this the next time a problem occurs, or maybe | Doxygen is appropriate? I could maybe be convinced that we should use Doxygen markup for documenting the C++ classes in the Octave source code. But I don't see any reason to convert all the docstrings for Octave functions and the text in the Octave manual to use Doxygen (if the latter change is even possible). jwe community of users of TeX and texinfo I think (hope) they will get working as before, subject only to the usual problems as we have just experienced. Michael |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |