[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?] |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:59:14 -0500 |
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:58 PM, logari81 wrote:
> 1. Current version of the fltk backend doesn't show minor ticks/grid,
> there is no bug report for this, but there is a patch:
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2011-January/022173.html
>
> 2. a)Color of axis labels / b)Positioning of axis labels at right and
> top:
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31800
> a) there is a patch for the colors, waiting for evaluation
> b) I can provide a patch for the positioning after the patch of (1) is
> accepted/pushed
>
> 3. I would also like to apply this patch:
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2011-January/022108.html
> but this also depend on the progress on (1)
>
> 4. Axes Position/Outerpositioning/Tightinset synchronization
> Probably will not do it for 3.4. I have a plan for fixing this but it is
> quite a long of work still (also depends on (1) and (3))
>
>
> Concerning the replacement of "backend" I don't have any fixed opinion.
> Concerning replacing "fltk" I would vote against "fltk_opengl", I would
> prefer one of "fltk" or "opengl".
>
> Best regards
>
> Kostas
I hope to look at the three changesets below in the next few days.
1. minorticks-restructure-draw_axes.changeset
2. bug-31800-color.changeset
3. axes-ticks-positioning.changeset
My intention is to run Soren's dump_demo script and make sure there are no
obvious reversions.
I'll respond back to this thread with what I find.
If there are no objections, and there are no reversions, I'll ask Kostas to
push.
Ben
- Re: branching for release?, (continued)
- Re: branching for release?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, logari81, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
- renaming "backend" (was: Re: branching for release?), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?],
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22
- Re: Matlab behavior for grid lines [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20