[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: combining nchoosek with bincoeff
From: |
dbateman |
Subject: |
Re: combining nchoosek with bincoeff |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:59:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:04:53PM +0100, Francesco Potort? wrote:
> > From the above it seems to me you're saying that in fact bincoeff and
> >nchoosek in fact have significant differences. I'd say make change 1a)
> >and remove the fixme.. Do you want to update your nchoosek changeset,
> >and I'll apply it..
>
> I made first a changeset to nchoosek, then one more, with respect to the
> previous one. Should I make one more, with respect to the last one?
> That would make three changesets in a chain.
>
> If you prefer a single changeset with respect to the official version (I
> do not know mercurial terminology) please suggest me how to do it using
> the hg command, as I could not understand it quickly by reading the
> docs...
Ok, then don't worry we can apply the three changeset seperately.. Don't have
much time at
the moment so I 'll aplly your changes for nchoosek later if some one else
doesn't do it
first
D.
>
> --
> Francesco Potort? (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
> ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
> via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
> (entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
>