[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plotting status in Octave
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Plotting status in Octave |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:37:33 -0500 |
2008/10/23 Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>:
> you can also type
>
> backend('fltk');
So, uhm... I know talk is cheap without me coding for it, but... why
fltk? It produces ugly widgets, while Qt produces native-looking
widgets. I can just imagine the Mac users complaining about plotting
in Octave because the widgets look ugly. :-/ Qt does have a huge set
of dependencies, though, plus all that weird macro hackery. Did you
choose fltk because it's lightweight, or because it integrates nicely
with OpenGL, or why?
Take my questions with a grain of salt unless they come with code. ;-)
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, (continued)
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/10/22
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/22
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Jonathan Stickel, 2008/10/22
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/22
- compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), Jonathan Stickel, 2008/10/30
- compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), John W. Eaton, 2008/10/30
- Re: compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), Jonathan Stickel, 2008/10/30
- Re: compiling from hg sources (was Re: Plotting status in Octave), Michael Goffioul, 2008/10/30
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Michael Goffioul, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Michael Goffioul, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, Shai Ayal, 2008/10/23
- Re: Plotting status in Octave, John Swensen, 2008/10/23
Re: Plotting status in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2008/10/22