Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:06 AM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On  6-May-2008, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | dbateman wrote:
> | >
> | >
> | > John W. Eaton wrote:
> | >> Is there a ChangeLog entry for this?  With that, I'd apply the change
> | >> (but skipping the diffs for the float matrix files I don't have yet).
> | >>
> | >
> | > Humm, I was sure I wrote one, but it seems not. I;ll send another 
> changeset
> | > with one later.
> | >
> | > All the float stuff is on my respository at hg.dbateman.org, starting at
> | > changeset 8002.
> |
> | The changeset is attached, however, I'm not sure how to handle the split
> | between the patch of this code you'll take and the single precision code
> | that you won't. So perhaps if you'd take the single precision code
> | before this stuff it might be easier. Could you examine further the
> | changesets
> |
> | 8002
> | 8003
> | 8004
> | 8006
> | 8015
> | 8017
> | 8019
> | 8056
> |
> | from http://hg.dbateman.org/octave and see what further you'd like to be
> | added to the single precision code before accepting it into 3.1..
>
> I applied all these changesets in one batch to my archive.
>
> | I'll work on the single precision type further in any case, including
> |
> | * single precision version of quad
>
> OK.
>
> | * perhaps the same for daspk, glpk, etc, but less sure of that
>
> This is not a high priority for me.
>
> | * Move more methods from teh derived classes to the Array classes to
> | clean up the code.
>
> OK.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>

What a huge update :) I see this is interferring non-trivially with
all my proposed changes (the compound operators repo and two pending
patches.) Shall I merge them? (And re-send the patches, probably).

-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz