On 20-Mar-2008, Thomas Weber wrote:
| I'm actually somewhat undecided about debbugs for Octave. The biggest
| problem for me is its concept of packages. While that fits extremely
| good for a distribution, I'm unsure about Octave. The emacs devs
| actually seemed to like it: bugs are sent in against a standard "target"
| and then assigned to one of the core componets as a replacement for
| packages. I'm not sure if such a splitting would make sense for Octave,
| though.
I don't think it matters whether we use more than one bug reporting
target/package/whatever. The important thing is to get an archive on
the web so that reports aren't dropped and it's clear when someone has
claimed a bug report and said that they will work on it.