Re: Patch for bar objects

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> On 11/19/07, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
>   
>> Ok, sorry I have 4 patches unapplied at the moment and missed that this
>> wasn't applied yet.. Ok, we are going to have a conflict between our
>> patches as well, if John applies them separately. Therefore please
>> consider the attached patch that combines both of our patches into a
>> single contribution..
>>     
>
> Fine for me, thanks.
> Note however that compared to Matlab, the bar width handling is slightly
> more complex in the group case: the width is than more related to individual
> bars than the group itself (although there's a relation between the bar width
> and the group width). For instance if the width is 0.8, inidividual bars are
> not collated within a group. If the width is 1, individual bars are collated
> within a group, *but* the groups are not collated (the group width is < 1).
> In our current code, I think that individual bars are always collated within
> a group and the specified width relates to the group, right?
>   

Yes, I believe that is correct..

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary