[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
fail.m ?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
fail.m ? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:21:24 -0500 |
On 15-Mar-2006, David Bateman wrote:
| Any reason that fail.m was removed from scripts/testfun?
A message from Paul Kienzle said that it was no longer needed. I sent
a note to you and Paul about this yesterday, in a message with the
subject "regexp and tests":
| 1. 'fail' has been superceded by 'error' and 'warning' blocks.
| No need to include it.
OK, I removed it.
| Its removal
| causes about 20 odd test to fail with "make check". In many cases you
| can replace these failing tests with "%!error" but I have found that
| some cases require
|
| %!test
| %! ...
| %! fail(...)
|
| and so it would be better to keep it in my opinion...
OK, if you think it should come back from the dead, I can arrange
that.
jwe
- fail.m ?, David Bateman, 2006/03/15
- fail.m ?,
John W. Eaton <=