[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?]
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?] |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:26:49 -0500 |
On 10-Feb-2005, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
| Paul Kienzle wrote:
|
| > Keeping stuff in m-files as much as possible really is attractive.
Yes, I agree. We should not convert everything to C++ just because we
can.
| If only the existing octave version could be made faster....
Probably it can be made faster. It might be a lot of work, but so is
converting everything to C++ and then maintaining it.
Also, how often are tril and triu used? I only see one use of triu
and none of tril in Octave's scripts directory, and none of either in
another relatively large collection of .m files written by a
colleague.
If it is really critical for some application that you have, then it
is easy enough to replace the .m version with your own .oct file.
jwe
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], (continued)
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/09
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/10
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/10
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/10
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/10
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?],
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Geordie McBain, 2005/02/11
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/23
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/23
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/24
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/24
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/24
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/24
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], David Bateman, 2005/02/24
- Re: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?], Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/24
- Class of User Types [Was: Moving code from octave-forge to octave [Was: polyderiv problem?]], David Bateman, 2005/02/25