[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave on Windows compiled with MinGW
From: |
Laurent Mazet |
Subject: |
Re: Octave on Windows compiled with MinGW |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:00:39 +0100 |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:18:54 +0100 (CET)
Ole Jacob Hagen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi, Laurent.
Hi Ole,
> Happy New year.
>
> I am now setting up MinGW and downloading Octave-2.1.64.
>
> Here is what you did:
> % Snip from
> http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2004/783 %
>
> - I used ./configure --disable-static --enable-shared
> --disable-readline
> --enable-dl
>
> - I added -lwsock32 which wasn't detected by ./configure
>
> - In /usr/include/winnt.h, I disabled typedef union IMAGE_AUX_SYMBOL
> because of
> a name conflict with Array.
>
> - For liboctinterp I added a $(DLD_PICOBJ) into the rule of
> src/Makefile
>
> - In src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/sort.cc, I 'sed' s/= octave_NaN/=
> lo_ieee_nan_value ()/
>
> - I finish install by hand, copying some dlls into the binary
> directory.
>
> % End of snip %
>
> What did you added in the rule $(DLD_PICOBJ) in the src/Makefile?
I'm sorry but I didn't kept the source on my hard-disk. If I remember correctly
liboctinterp.$(SHLEXT): $(PICOBJ) $(DLD_PICOBJ) $(PIC_XERBLA)
rm -f $@
$(SH_LD) $(SH_LDFLAGS) $(SONAME_FLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(OCTINTERP_LINK_DEPS)
> How does Octave work? Is it fast enough? Did you compiled with with
> gcc-3.2.x as well?
Well... I managed to start octave and run some tests/benchmarks. I spend all my
results on an octave mailing-list few months ago. But, frankly, without
readline nor kpathsearch nor fork, it wasn't really usefull.
I compiled it with the laster MinGW release i.e. gcc-3.2.x
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ole J.
--
Dr. Laurent Mazet: Research Engineer /V\ Centre de Recherche de MOTOROLA
Tel: +33 (0)1 69 35 48 30 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Email: address@hidden
- Re: Octave on Windows compiled with MinGW,
Laurent Mazet <=