[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[Denis Sbragion]

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #60237 (project octave):

Hello John,

tested with octave-2021-04-02-00-31-w64.

The problem with the pure Octave example of comment #10 now has gone and it
works.

It still doesn't work with the callback oct file of comment #9 when the
callback function is called the same way NLopt uses, i.e.:


retval = octave::feval (args(0).function_value(), newargs, nargout);


I tested also the other callback methods and it looks like the behaviour with
oct files hasn't changed, so of course it still doesn't work with NLopt
either. As I explained, I don't know if this should be considered a bug or
just a change in the way the API should be called.

Bye,

Denis Sbragion

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/