[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59022] [octave forge] (image) test failures in blockproc.m under Octave 6.0.90

[Hartmut]

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #59022 (project octave):

The email list comment from comment #4 suggests to use is_function_handle() to
check.

But this gives FALSE in Octave 6.0.90 for the return object of inline.m, and
it gives TRUE in Octave 5.2.0.

Maybe we should
* change the 10 test cases to use an anonymous function instead of the inline
thing.
* change the input checking code to do the check via is_function_handle()
instead of comparing class names to string values

Doing this would break old user code that uses inline objects with
blockproc.m. So maybe this is not the best solution. Any better idea?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59022>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/