[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-
From: |
Archisman Panigrahi |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:01:08 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/75.0 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58926>
Summary: Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when
diagonalizing large matrices
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: apandada1
Submitted on: Mon 10 Aug 2020 06:01:06 AM UTC
Category: Octave Function
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: 5.2.0
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: GNU/Linux
_______________________________________________________
Details:
I installed octave (5.2.0) and intel-mkl (2020.0.166) from the default
repositories of Ubuntu 20.04
When I try to diagonalize a large matrix, Octave gives wrong results with MKL
(it is much faster, though).
This is the code (https://pastebin.pl/view/611d6fe3) which gives wrong results
with MKL.
```
for a = 1:500
for b = 1:500
c(a,b) = sin(a + b^2);
endfor
endfor
g = eig(c);
max(real(g))
```
The correct result is `ans = 16.915` (I checked this before installing
intel-mkl, and also in another Ubuntu 18.04 installation in the same computer,
where intel-mkl was not installed).
With MKL in Ubuntu 20.04, I get random numbers of order 10^5 - 10^6, which
change every time the code is run.
I don't know whether this is related to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921207
_______________________________________________________
File Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 10 Aug 2020 06:01:06 AM UTC Name: testmkl.m Size: 96B By:
apandada1
code which produces wrong results with MKL
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=49648>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58926>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices,
Archisman Panigrahi <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/11