|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #56752] Performance slowdown from version 3.2.4 through to current dev branch |
Date: | Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:03:51 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 |
Follow-up Comment #24, bug #56752 (project octave): RE comment #23, I suppose we could return a reference to a static undefined octave_value object for out of bounds accesses in that case, but have we needed it before now? I can see a possible way to eliminate the need to have names attached to the octave_value_list but it will require more refactoring than I can do in an hour or two. If I can do it, I think that's the best solution since it simplifies the octave_value_list object and makes names of arguments passed to functions solely the responsibility of the evaluator. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56752> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |