[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55667] Conflict between package namespace and function name

[Philip Nienhuis]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #55667 (project octave):

>  _From the point of view of the implementation, I'd be glad to eliminate the
possibility of further indexing function calls_

Probably it'll bring some pain for recoding, sure. But another question: does
further or repeated indexing save memory?
In Matlab, I'd have to slice and sub-slice numeric/struct/cell arrays using
intermediate variables for each indexing step and that sometimes takes
considerable RAM (esp. cell arrays); I figured that one of the advantages of
repeated indexing would be avoiding these intermediate storgae steps. Am I
right there?


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55667>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/