Re: check if message is in a particular sequence?

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Paul,

> it became clear that the range compression was an impediment.  Now
> that I've added the ability to explicitly ask "is message 4 part of
> sequence foo", range compression isn't really an issue, but it feels
> like we should be able to control it.  I'd kind of like to add
> -terse/-noterse:

-range/-norange.  :-)

> (I'd also love to fix the old bug that causes "9 10" to be displayed as
> "9-10", but I probably shouldn't.  Someone probably relies on it.)

I wasn't aware it was a bug, more an easy way to spot singletons;
messages without an adjacent neighbour in the sequence.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.