Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode

nmh-workers

From:	Ken Hornstein
Subject:	Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode
Date:	Sat, 13 Jul 2019 18:32:10 -0400

>I can't tell from the repo why that's the default.  I agree that it
>should be changed.  Any objection to the following change?

LGTM

--Ken

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Conrad Hughes, 2019/07/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, David Levine, 2019/07/13
  - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein <=
  - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/07/14
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, David Levine, 2019/07/14
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/14
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/07/17
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/17
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/07/17
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Conrad Hughes, 2019/07/17
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/17
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Conrad Hughes, 2019/07/17
    - Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/17