Re: [nmh-workers] The State of exmh.

[Håkon Alstadheim]

Den 07.11.2018 21:52, skrev Ken Hornstein:
> > I considered poking around
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users for signs of life,
> > but those archives are subscriber only.
> You know, this has always driven me nuts.  Why is it set like this?  Can
> that be opened up?
You could always subscribe. Below is last msg on address@hidden, 
from today:

Den 07.11.2018 07:15, skrev address@hidden:
> I tagged 2.9.0 and pushed it to the git repository and 2.9.0 tarballs to the
> sourceforge project page.  I *think* I caught most of the important 2.8.0->
> 2.9.0 references. If I missed anything, yell...
>
> In related questions:  Is it going to cause any issues if I make nmh 1.6 the
> minimum supported underlying MH release? I'm looking at taking a baseball bat
> to our current multipart composition support, but it would leverage mhbuild
> which first appeared in nmh 1.6.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers