nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] possible problem with mhfixmsg in nmh-1.7


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] possible problem with mhfixmsg in nmh-1.7
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:39:54 +0000

Hi David,

> It looks like Ralph found and fixed all hard-coded uses of the ','
> backup prefix, including the three in test-mhfixmsg.

I also ./configured with --with-hash-backup to make sure, and have that
as my default for development now.  I did notice that the distcheck
target fails to pass that on, along with quite a few other user-chosen
options?  Is that deliberate?  I see there's
AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS, presumably that's where they'd go.

It has the convenient side-effect at the moment of using `#' for the top
build, and `,' for the distcheck, but we'd ideally stress a buildbot by
trying quite a few configure combinations, including throwing in a
symlink.  Speaking of which, is there someone on the list familiar with
buildbot that would want to host a public one for nmh?

> > (Yes, this is intended to imply that your suggested fix of pwd -P
> > worked perfectly.):
>
> If Ralph is unavailable to commit the fix soon, I will.

It's 0e593b90 on master.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]