[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:05:51 -0500 |
>> Well, I use scan.size, and I noticed right away.
>
>So you often don't have the full message number on display?
scan.size uses %4(msg), and I don't have any folders with more than 9999
messages. So ... no? I see scan.default uses %4(msg) as well.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, David Levine, 2017/11/21
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/22