[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:43:06 -0700 |
Paul Fox <address@hidden> writes:
>okay -- that was silly of me to say i didn't have time.
>
>i have a patch that changes the priority of multiple -prefer switches
>to ascending, and also fixes the man pages. i won't push to master
>yet, so as not to step on anyone's toes.
>
>but a question: even with this, is there still value in a -noprefer
>option, to force the default behavior? my use of -prefer is very
>simple (just one -prefer switch, only used by a wrapper script) so i
>think i'm not a good judge.
>
>norm -- will the proposed priority order change (which lets -prefer
>switches on the command line override those in .mh_profile) solve your
>problem?
Yes, it would solve my immediate problem just fine. But, more on behalf of
others than me, I still see advantages of a -noprefer switch
Norman Shapiro
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, norm, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Robert Elz, 2017/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, David Levine, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Ken Hornstein, 2017/09/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/09