[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:04:19 -0400 |
>I've reproduced similar symptoms with an mhbuild-produced email where I
>tacked on CR to the end of every line after the blank line after the
>headers. IOW, without the headers having CR. However, I still think
>this is an invalid format email; why should we handle CR at any
>location?
Sigh. I'm of two minds about that. Technically those are valid RFC 5322
messages; our wrinkle is that we techically support RFC 5322 messages with
Unix line endings. But that is pretty standard on Unix systems, and this
was definitely not a normal use case.
>The content shouldn't be truncated without an error exit
>status though.
As I see it (the strcmp() is failing, right?) it probably misses the
first boundary part and counts the whole message as a preamble, right?
I do not think throwing an error for not finding a MIME boundary in the
message would be a good idea, at least in the normal tools. I could see
mhfixmsg maybe complaining about it.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Paul Fox, 2017/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, David Levine, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, David Levine, 2017/08/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, David Levine, 2017/08/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/29