[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh Speed Measured by ltrace(1).
|
From: |
Howard Bampton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh Speed Measured by ltrace(1). |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:40:02 -0400 |
Silly question. I don't see any mention of buffer cache effects being
worked around. Are you running a scan, tossing the results, then
rerunning the scan?
I know with rsync on large directory trees (even when nothing needs
changed), the second and later passes are substantially quicker and I
would expect a similar, albeit less pronounced (~5K files vs. ~1M in
my experiences), outcome here.