[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to mh-draft.man

From: Larry Hynes
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to mh-draft.man
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:28:52 +0000

Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Larry,
> >  directly, they supply
> >  .B send
> > -with the UNIX pathname of the message draft, and
> > -.B not
> > -a
> > +with the UNIX pathname of the message draft; NOT a
> >  .B \-draftmessage
> >  .I msg
> >  argument.  As far as
> Must we shout for emphasis?  :-)

Oh - you were talking about NOT! lol.

Yes, the use of NOT is well-established - 19 instances. I do think
it's preferable to

        .B not

in case some poor soul things not(1) is an nmh command. (It sort
of sounds like one, in fairness.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]