[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw.man

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw.man
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:55:11 +0000


> > I can see why the `(5)' is dropped on the second reference, so soon
> > after the first, but why does it become bold instead of italic?

For completeness, Larry replied, accidentally off list, to say that was
just a simple mistake.  And I agree with kre's comment on the `contains'
v. `is'.

Cheers, Ralph.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]